Search Here....

2010年12月24日 星期五

Why Elizabeth Warren will benefit of Wall Street.

Global banking Regulators, recently decided to tighten the rules on banks by requiring them to hold more capital against their assets to another financial panic like what has mushroomed in 2008. New demands will be cut into profits, because banks will have less money to make and less freedom to play. Yet instead of falling prices, financial stocks have risen since the announcement. The new rules, it turned out that made investors feel more comfortable about the banks, not less.

[See 11 ways planning to double dip recession.]

It is still perceived threat to the financial industry: Elizabeth Warren, user-friendly firebrand President Obama used to the new Bureau of financial protection for consumers. Professor at Harvard University has been a long time a critic of the Wall Street alert about sky-high rates credit cards hidden fees and other illegal lending practices.Some of their suggestions were included in the recent banking reforms. as Chair of Congressional oversight, monitoring economic assistance to the Obama administration it also castigated processing public relief homeowner, TARP bailouts, rescue AIG, crediting of small business and other federal programs. Critics label her liberal Crusader, even though she made enemies among Republicans and Democrats alike.

In her new job Warren will manage credit cards, mortgages, banking services and a wide range of financial products that consumers use every day. On Wall Street have fear and Loathing on still excessively Reformer, deleted the banks. But it's far more likely that the strict banking critic as Warren can help to restore confidence and to enhance their business — what they obviously cannot do for themselves.

Wall Street executives tend to view the financial reforms as unduly interfering with extraneous savvy who don't understand finance. If the system is broken, financial managers would be that there is no use, fixing it. But the system is so flawed, Wall Street, as we know it would fail if the Feds not rushed to the rescue in 2008.

[See how do I know when the recession is really more.]

Thanks to the generosity of the banks back on their feet. But taxpayers who bailed out the banks have never been more devious, once considered a foundation community. In polls, Gallup only 23 percent of Americans express confidence in banks.Just before the recession was 41%.More recently, in 2005, he was above 50%, it's hard to think of any other industry, which the public esteem so declined sharply.

It may seem like American consumers captive for banks, so it doesn't matter whether we despise them or not. But, looking like a flawed assumption. Credit, a great source of revenue for banks, credit cards are much more consumers down using a debit card, or simply rely on cash. One factor in the new "strategic defaults — people stop their mortgage payments, even if they can afford to keep them is hostility to lenders, got a taxpayer bailouts, but they mercilessly inflexible towards their own customers.

[See 4 characters is finally improving labour market]

Banks generally have a bad reputation, "said Duke University Professor Dan Ariely's Predictably irrational and bestselling author of irrationality."But none of them are taking steps to boost our confidence if some of them will make a move and give us more reasons to trust them, we, as consumers will flock to these banks ' Plus banking reform could never have if not for the wave of public outrage, exceeded one of the most powerful lobbies in Washington.

Flustered bankers currently browsing Elizabeth Warren is another Sheriff, riding into town with her six-shooter.But as with other reforms, fears are almost certainly exaggerated.Even if Warren going after banks with vigor vigilante, it cannot work alone.A new Office, it will work to communicate new creation, called on the Council to oversee the financial stability, which could curb Warren if she strays too far from the core rules.As Warren split picture you have courted the enemies and made its views known through the media, it will sometimes show a little respect for the Congress for new staff. "This political pressure could interfere with her work, especially if the Republicans win the House or Senate this fall, "says analysts Jaret Seiberg Washington Research Group, political consultants.

[See 5 economic flubs, that will cost the Democrats the.]

When Warren, it'll have much more confidence than someone finds a friend of the banking industry is designed to help you create a greater confidence in the system over time. financial industry went through a similar trial, when THE FED announced its plan to hold a "stress tests" of the largest banks in the first half of 2009. scepticism and unease, pervasive kvetching about Government overreach the first reaction of Wall Street, but stress tests proved a turning point in the whole of the financial crisis. Analytics credited THE FED for tests that seem to be quite tough but not overbearing. most banks over, and those that are not capital quickly met the objectives set out in THE FED'S implementation helps you easily fears of insolvent banks and probably not by chance that once FED went public with the test results in huge stocks went 13-month rally.

[Find out if you are a "consumer zombie".]

CFPB are almost power fed and Warren, itself will probably be surprised if she ever did everything that was in bank stocks rally, but Wall Street could do worse than a new regulator, determined to keep them honest. they've proved that.


View the original article here

沒有留言:

張貼留言